Monday, March 03, 2008

Ariel Atom 500 V8

A fast car may have a power to weight ratio of 1 horsepower for every 20 lbs. The 1001 horsepower, 254 MPH, Bugatti Veyron has a 1/4 ratio. The Ariel Atom 500 V8 packs 500 horsepower into a package that weighs just over 1000 lbs. Per pound, it has twice the power of the Bugatti. Holy _____ . Supposedly, you can drive this on the street. I know I could -- for about five seconds. After that they'd be peeling me off the side of a building like a sticker. I don't know whether they'd be able to peel the smile off my face or not. Here's a clip of an Ariel Atom in action. I don't know whether it is the V8 or not.

Sunday, March 02, 2008

Predatory Lending Association

If you have 5 minutes to spare, check out http://www.predatorylendingassociation.com/. this is actually a parody website, spoofing the various industry-trade sites in the consumer lending industry, especially those relating to payday loans. predatorylendingassociation.com is basically an "honest" version of those sites.


Models or Not?
Netherlands for Healthcare
Finland for Education

Things have been flying at me right and left lately. Thank goodness for the exercise bike as an excuse to actually read some of it. I received my issue of the Public Citizen Health Letter which has a cover story discussing in detail the healthcare system in the Netherlands. The Dutch system has been hailed by some as an alternative to single payer plans and a model for adoption in the US. Public Citizen doesn't think so. Very briefly, the Dutch plan is a spiritual successor to the "managed competition" Clinton plan of the 1990s. The cornerstone of the plan is mandatory private insurance, with about 1/3 of the total premiums paid by the state through a health care tax. The biggest problem with the system per Public Citizen is the 30% administrative overhead consumed by the insurance companies. The system has limited benefits and does not actually provide universal care. The health letter is not available on line.

The second thing is a Wall Street Journal article about the education system in Finland. After objecting to my children's (public) school uniform policy, it is comforting to know that in Finland, where the schools beat all comers, there are no school uniforms. Surprisingly, children don't start school until age 7, and the classes are not differentiated by ability. Check out the story, it's an interesting read.

Friday, February 29, 2008

Chevy Beats Toyota
. . . but CR's Top 10 is an American 1

Consumer Reports' annual April Auto Issue should be hitting shelves and mailboxes as you read this. Consumer Reports is stingy with free online content, but its top picks in 10 categories is linked here. The good news for the traditional American automakers is that Consumer Reports ranks the newish Chevrolet Silverado ahead of the also newish Toyota Tundra, largely because of reliability problems with the Toyota V-8. Congratulations Chevrolet. The bad news is that none of the rest of the top ten picks is from any of the formerly Big 3 automakers, and none of the rest of the top ten are UAW-made.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

"They're Lying Bastards"
Lenders are still not fulfilling Mortgage Workout Promises

Here's a link to a Reuters article that confirms what I've been seeing and hearing about concerning the alleged workout deals for problem mortgages. The writer, Nick Carey cites several sources in support of the conclusion that most consumers are not getting helped by foreclosure avoidance programs. On February 5, I called the loans that were being promised by the President's "Hope now" program Luna Loans. I call them Luna Loans because Harry Potter's pal, Luna Lovegood, is the only one who has ever seen them. Maybe we could call them "Great Pumpkin" loans, because you can see them if you are very, very, very sincere. No, I like the term "luna loan".

Monday, February 25, 2008

Youtube Video of the Day
The Chimp Channel Star Wars

Usually I try to find some relevance to the videos that I post. This time, I'm not going to bother. Here's The Chimp Channel Star Wars. The name completely explains it. Thanks to Ariana for the link.

Friday, February 22, 2008

Dodge Journey: The First Review - and Maybe the Last Hurrah

One of my favorite auto reviews, Michael Karesh at thetruthaboutcars.com, has posted his review of the brand new Dodge Journey. It's linked here. Quite frankly, William Hung has received better reviews. The Dodge Journey replaces one of Chrysler's bread and butter vehicle lines, the short-wheelbase minivans. In this case, it appears that bread and butter has been replaced with government cheese.

I can actually save you some time in reading Michael Karesh's review. He thought the Journey handled alright, but he didn't like anything else about it. Note: if you follow Karesh's reviews at epinions.com, you'll find that he has scoured the car lots to find a three-row vehicle that is practical, but fun to drive. He didn't find it here. As far as quality control is concerned, here's a quote:

And then there's quality control…The V6 had a quarter-inch of water in the front
passenger floorboard (promptly extracted via shop vac). The source was soon
revealed, as a gurgle could periodically be heard from the perimeter of the
sunroof and water rained down from the overhead console throughout the test
drive. Get this: it wasn't raining outside the car at the time; it had rained the previous
day.


The Journey is actually the stretched-wheelbase, station wagon version of the Dodge Avenger. The Avenger has the dubious achievement of being the lowest scoring family sedan in Consumer Reports' current rankings, trailing even its loathsome stablemate, the Chrysler Sebring. In other words, I didn't have high expectations for the Journey.

Striking out with a new product is especially problematic for Chrysler, a company whose new product pipeline is not exactly filled to the brim. Now, let's say I'm a struggling auto maker, and I'm introducing an important new model at a very difficult time. I would say that it would generally be a bad idea to ship one to a reviewer that leaks like a sieve. It seems like Chrysler would do well to restart a production line with the old style (paid for) minivan, and plan on updating the powertrain as soon as possible. The Journey doesn't improve on price, space, performance, fuel efficiency or (probably) quality. In my opinion, it doesn't even improve on looks.

In the spirit of fairness, if I see a review of the Journey that contradicts what Mr. Karesh has to say, I'll mention it in the blog. If I get the chance to test one, I'll publish that as well.

By the way, the UAW is not responsible for the mess that Chrysler made of the Journey, the Journey is built in Mexico.

Thursday, February 21, 2008

26.3 MPG in a Chevy Tahoe? No Way
Yes, Way - Per Mark Phelan

Mark Phelan, the auto reviewer for the Detroit Free Press has posted his (glowing) review of the 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid. During his test period, he reports an average MPG of 26.3 in all around driving, handily beating the EPA figures of 21-22. The Tahoe hybrid is a full hybrid (ala the Toyota Prius) unlike the GM hybrid cars currently marketed. Phelan's test vehicle, a fully-equipped 2-wheel-drive model, has a sticker price of $50,885. That's a big chunk of change, and much more than I have spent or plan to spend on a vehicle. On the other hand, there are some full-sized SUVs that cost more.

One can argue that once you get to this price level, the price of fuel even for a guzzler is a small portion of the cost of ownership. That's true. On the other hand, as Phelan points out, the annual savings in fuel costs (he calculates at $1330) between the hybrid Yukon and a comparable non-hybrid SUV is higher than the difference between, say, a Chevrolet Malibu and a Toyota Prius.

As a practical matter, innovations tend to originate on higher priced models, and as the experience curve results in refinements and cost savings, they trickle down to less expensive models. Viewed in that light, as a dollars and cents proposition, the hybrid option on the Tahoe might not make sense today, but as a harbinger for what's possible in the future, it's a positive development.

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Chrysler Plastered by Judge's Plastech Decision
Tools must stay put.


Federal Bankruptcy Judge Phillip Shefferly ruled that Chrysler can't just pick up its ball and bat and go back home. He ruled against Chrysler in its bankruptcy dispute with Plastech. The story in the Detroit News is here. The judge said that even though Chrysler owns the tools that it wants to recover from the Plastech facility, possession by Plastech is enough for Plastech to retain the tools while it tries to restructure in chapter 11 bankruptcy. To allow Chrysler to recover the tools would be to doom the plan to failure.

Interestingly, Chrysler's position was supported by many of Plastech's other customers, including General Motors and Toyota, even though those customers' could be delayed or jeopardized should Chrysler's tool recovery force plant shut downs. The saga continues. . .

UAW Approved Vehicle Website

Last week there was controversy over whether the Toyota Matrix was an approved vehicle by the UAW. I checked the UAW-made website. It lists some Corollas as being approved, but the Matrix is NOT listed. Apparently Toyota has shifted its production mix, moving the Matrix out of the NUMMI plant and the Corolla in. The Corolla is produced at numerous plants though, so don't assume that any Corolla that you see on a lot will receive the UAW stamp of approval. More to the point, don't assume that if you drive even your UAW-built Corolla to a pre-retirement seminar at a UAW hall that you'll receive a warm welcome.

Friday, February 15, 2008

Youtube Video of the Day
IF


I have some serious stuff backed up, waiting for me to write about. I can't see doing that though, when I can post a video of Telly Savalas singing (?) the Bread hit If instead.




What do you think, better or worse than Shatner?

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

The "Hope Now" Program is Hopeless

Criticism of the President's "Hope Now" program for mortgage foreclosure assistance is mounting. Susan Keating, President and CEO of the National Foundation for Credit Counseling has put forth a scalding public letter to Faith Schwartz, the Executive Director of Hope Now. Ms. Keating so elequently describes some of the failings of the Hope Now program that I am republishing her letter in its entirety below. In case you don't want to read it, the gist of the letter is that the program seems to have been designed to create an appearance of help while at the same time actually helping nobody.

February 6, 2008
Ms. Faith Schwartz
Executive Director of HOPE NOW
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Suite 500 South
Washington, DC 20004
Dear Faith:
The National Foundation for Credit Counseling (“NFCC”) strongly objects to the
extortionist tactics being utilized by the Homeownership Preservation Foundation
(“HPF”) to limit the options and opportunities of American consumers at risk of losing
their homes.
At issue is the ability of qualified HUD-approved counseling agencies to provide services
under the National Foreclosure Mitigation Counseling Program (“NFMCP”) using a tollfree
number that has been heavily promoted by the highest levels of the United States
Government, and the concerted efforts of the HPF to use that number as a monopoly for a
select few counseling agencies to the detriment of hundreds of thousands of homeowners
seeking to avoid foreclosure.
By direction of President Bush, and under the leadership of Treasury Secretary Paulson
and HUD Secretary Jackson, the HOPE NOW Alliance was formed. One of the basic
tenets of the Alliance was characterized as an aggressive plan to reach the greatest
number of troubled borrowers in an effort to prevent foreclosure wherever possible by
expanding the availability of mortgage counseling. In addition, with the encouragement
of Secretary Paulson and Secretary Jackson, mortgage lenders, servicers and investors
have collectively contributed funding to support mortgage foreclosure prevention
counseling services.
To further the objective, the resources of the HPF were utilized. Specifically, an HPF
toll-free number was designated as the “Homeowner HOPE Hotline” and was used to
connect troubled homeowners to one of only five counseling agencies invited to
participate by the HPF. The process and criteria used by the HPF to select those agencies
was apparently totally subjective. From its inception, the demand for services through
the Hotline have out-paced the ability of the HPF network to provide them. As President
Bush, Secretary Paulson, Secretary Jackson and other government officials heavily
promoted the toll-free number of the Hotline, the HPF increasingly struggled to handle
the volume of calls and to provide services. At one point, with mortgage concerns on the
rise, 26% of the calls to the HPF Hotline went unanswered and were abandoned. To put
that in human terms, more than one out of every four homeowners seeking help to save
2
their homes were unable to connect with a counselor. This failure may also have
discouraged an untold number of homeowners from seeking assistance from other HUDapproved
and qualified counseling agencies that were ready and able to provide the
services that they desperately needed.
Although the HPF has been able to improve their service level, they still struggle and
many consumers are not well served. A major participant in the HPF Hotline was
recently quoted on CNNMoney.com as saying that because of the high volume of calls,
“it had to limit its services only to customers who were delinquent on their mortgage
payments, referring other customers who were not delinquent to their own lenders.” In
other words, callers to the HPF Hotline were being told that unless they were already in
default, they were not going to be provided with the assistance and counseling they were
seeking. In addition, anecdotally, it has been reported that for some of those who did
manage to get through on the HPF Hotline, “counseling” consisted of little more than a
call center in-take process followed by a referral to their mortgage lender.
The NFCC has been and remains deeply concerned by harm being done to consumers
seeking to save their homes due to this artificial and indefensible limitation on the
number of agencies and counselors available to provide the quality mortgage foreclosure
prevention counseling and services that are needed. Repeatedly, the NFCC, as the
nation’s largest HUD-approved Housing Counseling Intermediary, has offered the
resources of more than 70 HUD-approved counseling agencies and more than 750
certified credit and housing counselors to provide services through the Hotline.
However, the HPF has to date rejected the NFCC’s offer, telling the NFCC that the
utilization of its resources “did not fit HPF’s business model.” The NFCC does not
understand a “business model” that fails to provide homeowners with the assistance that
they need to avoid foreclosure and to enable consumers to take strides toward personal
financial stability. Nevertheless, primarily due to the efforts of the President, Cabinet
Secretaries and other high government officials, the HPF Hotline has increasingly been
identified as the official U.S. Government-sanctioned means by which a troubled
homeowner should be connected with a qualified counselor of a HUD-approved
counseling agency.
This de facto government endorsement carries with it a reasonable expectation that all
qualified agencies should be eligible to participate in the Hotline and eligible to receive
funding for counseling services raised through the efforts and encouragement of federal
and other government officials.
Because of the escalating nature of the mortgage foreclosure crisis, Congress took
decisive action by including $180 million for the National Foreclosure Mitigation
Counseling Program in the Omnibus Appropriations Bill enacted in December. It should
be noted that the legislation does not provide funding for the HOPE NOW Alliance or the
HPF Hotline, but instead makes funding available to the broader range of HUD-approved
housing counseling intermediaries and state housing finance authorities. The legislation
is designed to make quality mortgage counseling services available to as many
homeowners, especially in areas of greatest need, as rapidly as possible. Nonprofit credit
3
and housing counseling agencies may apply for grant funds through HUD-approved
intermediaries. Agencies must select one intermediary, and if they seek funding through
multiple intermediaries, “they must justify why this is critical in order to meet the
demand for foreclosure prevention counseling in their service area.” The amount of
funding that an agency receives will be contingent on the number of sessions and the
level of services they provide. Level 1 services are those around in-take and basic
counseling services; Level 2 services are more comprehensive counseling services, and
are designed to meet the full needs of troubled homeowners.
Clearly, the intention of Congress was to expand the availability of mortgage foreclosure
prevention and to utilize all the tools created through the efforts of the federal
government.
Individually, several NFCC agencies have been invited by the HPF to participate in and
receive calls through the Hotline. Recognizing that extensive government resources have
been used to promote it, those agencies view participation in the Hotline as an essential
opportunity to provide much-needed housing counseling services to the consumers they
serve, especially as federal grant funds through the NFMCP become available to support
their operations. However, those agencies see no reason to bind themselves to the HPF
intermediary for those funds as there is nothing in the statutory language or legislative
history to even remotely suggest that Congress intended to require that funding for
services be tied to the means by which consumers are connected to counseling agencies.
Nevertheless, the HPF has been extremely aggressive in their efforts to force agencies to
join their NFMCP intermediary. The HPF has blatantly threatened NFCC agencies that
unless they agree to be part of the HPF intermediary, no calls via the Hotline will be
directed to their agencies. In addition, the HPF is insisting that agencies may only
provide the limited Level 1 services under the HPF intermediary, regardless of the needs
of the troubled homeowner. These actions are completely at odds with the announced
goals of the HOPE NOW Alliance and the intentions of Congress, and are extremely
detrimental to consumers seeking mortgage foreclosure prevention counseling.
Further, the HPF’s egregious actions are inconsistent with the efforts of the
Administration and federal officials in their promotion of the Hotline and the use of
federal funds to pay for counseling services. With federal support, the Hotline should be
utilized to link homeowners facing the loss of their homes to the next available HUDqualified
counselor without regard to whether that agency happens to be part of the
HPF’s attempted monopoly.
Qualified agencies should have the option to choose the HUD-approved intermediary that
best aligns with their values and commitment to the provision of comprehensive high
quality mortgage foreclosure prevention counseling and financial education services. It is
appalling that the HPF is attempting to coerce agency participation in the HPF NFMCP
intermediary as a condition of having access to consumers using a federally sanctioned
and endorsed toll-free number. Nor is it right that number is being monopolized by a
single entity, the HPF.
4
The NFCC calls on the HOPE NOW Alliance to act immediately to curtail these
unconscionable efforts on the part of the HPF. If that fails, the NFCC will actively seek
Congressional oversight hearings on the utilization of federal government resources to
establish and promote a virtual monopoly around the provision of desperately needed
housing counseling and mortgage foreclosure mitigation services at the expense of
consumers across the country seeking to save their homes.
Sincerely,
Susan C. Keating
President and CEO
National Foundation for Credit Counseling
CC: Secretary Henry M. Paulson
Secretary Alphonso R. Jackson
Senator Harry Reid
Senator Mitch McConnell
Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Representative John Boehner
Senator Christopher J. Dodd
Senator Richard C. Shelby
Representative Barney Frank
Representative Spencer Bachus
Senator Carl Levin
Senator Debbie Stabenow
Kenneth D. Wade